The home page with grid populated with the default sample data was over 125K, not counting images, graphics, css, and considerable amounts of included javascript. The Web version did have what I feel are VERY heavy page weights. I can see using either without any concerns that I'm "not seeing something" by using the Web version. The WinForms and the WebForms applications have surprising parity of look and functionality. I always mess with the defaults to see if an app can handle it. The datagrids include excellent filtering, grouping, sorting, yada yada support. It's fairly classic three-pane style with tabs. The sample data is pretty extensive and include three fictional projects and their numerous associated sub-projects. I was pretty pleased to see on the database configuration dialog a "Populate New Database with Sample Data" checkbox. However, these are nits, and the install in total was all of 10 minutes. ![]() It would be nice if OnTime helped diagnose that likely common problem in a friendlier way. Once I switched over to Mixed Mode it was cool. This caused trouble when I tried to run the Web version of OnTime. Also, I installed my MSDE instance as "Windows Integrated Auth" only, and I should have used Mixed Mode, allowing both Windows users and SQL users to connect. They suggest in the Planning Section to use MSDE Instances, but then Instances aren't mentioned later in the help. SQL quick start) been in the OnTime help file. It would have been nice had that tip (or a step-by-step MSDE vs. I was a little confused since I used MSDE and had forgotten the (local)/instance style of connection string. On running each application I was prompted to connect the database. They came in three MSIs, and we're trivial installs (next, next, next, finish). Then I installed the WinForms, Web and VS.NET versions of OnTime. I installed a private instance of MSDE that I called (local)/OnTime before starting. Not sure how long that will last, but free software is always a good thing. Also, for a limited time they've got a free 2-user license if you mention their software (so they get Google Juice). That'd be a great way to start out with lifecycle management tools for the independent developer and gives AxoSoft a way to compete with the free BugZilla tools. AxoSoft also offers a Customer-facing Portal that can enable users to report bugs themselves.įinally, if you're not into managing the infrastructure or SQL/Windows licenses yourself, there's a hosted plan. Patrick Cauldwell mentioned today that he heard at Devscovery yesterday a koan that really resonated with him: "If you have get an unhandled exception, you've never executed that code in that way before." Integrating the defect tracking system with the application itself is cool thing. ( example screencast) I can imagine building defect submission directly into a Help|About box or a global exception handler. This is pretty powerful stuff and it's a shame more applications don't take the effort to expose their core engine as Web Services. There is an SDK in the form of a rich Web Services interface into the OnTime system for integrating into other lifecycle management systems that you may already have in place. You of course are bound by MSDE's size and concurrency limitations if you take that road, but a team of 5 could certainly do well with MSDE, IMHO. I used a private MSDE installation with no problems. You can use SQL Server or MSDE for your backend. They also have an "Enterprise Server" edition that lets remote users connect via Web Service rather than directly to back-end SQL. It aims to be a complete system for Software Project Management and provides not only a Web-based solution, but also a complete WinForms solution as well as one that integrates with VS.NET as a toolbox. NET-based application suite for managing many aspects of the software development lifecycle. ![]() However, I did receive a free copy of the software.ĪxoSoft's "OnTime 2005" - Team-Based Defect, Feature and Task Tracking SoftwareĪxoSoft's OnTime 2005 is. Updated: I haven't been paid for this review and won't be. This review is by me personally, and has nothing to do with my company who does not use or advocate the user of this tool. I'm usually happy to review software and tools when time permits, I'll always do it in an unbiased way to the best of my ability, and the small stipend (or free gadgets) is a nice recognition of the value of my time. I received an email recently asking if I'd review AxoSoft's OnTime 2005 Team-Based Defect, Feature and Task Tracking software in exchange for a small fee.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |